The ILF has identified a number of key priority areas that are inhibiting the recognition of chronic oedema as a major, emerging public health care problem. These include the need for international epidemiology to provide evidence of the size and impact on health care services. This topic amongst others have been addressed in the LIMPRINT study.
A second aspect that has not received sufficient attention is the lack of agreed international standards and methods for assessing and reporting the outcome of treatment of patients with different forms of chronic oedema.
The most commonly used primary outcome measure in chronic oedema or lymphoedema trials or studies is changes in limb volume. There are many different methods used and a lack of standardisation. Some studies, particularly in breast cancer, adopt other methods including symptom rating and mixed methods. The diversity of approaches means that it is almost impossible to compare studies. This issue is particularly difficult for reimbursement and healthcare agencies for which limb volume change currently has little or no meaning.
The overall goal for the ILF-COM endeavour is to agree and validate international measures to be used by the lymphoedema community in both clinical practice and research. This should assist in providing robust guidance for reimbursement agencies.
A qualitative study to explore the challenges faced by the medical device industry in the development of compression and reimbursement were conducted. Twelve countries agreed to be part of the ILF-COM project and all first interviews with each country are now completed. Furthermore, eight companies who produce compression therapy and have expertise in reimbursement took part in 11 individual semi-structured interviews. Data was analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Results are presented in a special supplement to the Journal of Wound Care published in November 2021.
During 2018 and 2019 an international survey was conducted by active involvement of identified key stakeholders. The survey was available in several translations and was completed with 8,014 respondents including patients, healthcare professionals and industry representatives from 61 countries including 12 framework countries. The international survey was elaborated by active involvement of key stakeholders during international meetings held during 2018.
Undertaking the international survey served several purposes including identifying:
A scoping systematic review of current methods of chronic oedema and lymphoedema outcome measurement has been completed with 7,818 entries reviewed by two independent reviewers and independent review of 800 conflicts. The full results were presented at the ILF 2021 conference.
ILF-COM project phase 2 is focused on developing a chronic oedema and wound care tool based on the results of phase 1. Phase 2 includes the following steps:
The validation of a chronic oedema/complex wound outcome measure will include an international development and validation within the national frameworks.
The Journal of Wound Care has published a supplement with findings of the ILF-COM project phase 1 in November 2021.
Furthermore, an international poster exhibition presented first findings from the project at the ILF 2019 Conference. The posters are available on this page.
The ILF-COM project phase 2 is developed with support from unrestricted educational grants from 3M and Jobst.
The ILF-COM project phase 1 was developed with support from unrestricted educational grants by 3M, BSN, Thuasne, Sigvaris, Specialbandager, and Tactile Medical.
THIS PROJECT IS SUPPORTED BY
FIRST ILF-COM FINDINGS
First ILF-COM findings were presented at the poster exhibition at the ILF 2019 conference in Chicago, June 2019. Download the posters here: